- The Knowledge
- Posts
- For Putin, Gaza is the gift that keeps on giving
For Putin, Gaza is the gift that keeps on giving
đ Nudist beaches | đ Emoji art | đď¸ Rubbish recycling
Comment
Getty
For Putin, Gaza is the gift that keeps on giving
Thereâs no evidence that Vladimir Putin had anything to do with Hamasâs brutal slaughter of innocent Israelis on October 7, says Edward Luce in the FT. But heâs certainly a âleading beneficiaryâ. The geopolitical chaos that has followed that date â his birthday, as it happens â might as well have been âgift-wrapped to Moscowâ. Not only has it taken the worldâs attention away from Ukraine, but it has also made it far easier to paint Joe Bidenâs âliberal international orderâ as a hollow shell. And as Israeli forces move into the densely populated enclave of Rafah, âthat is only likely to get worseâ.
Itâs a vicious circle. The more chaos there is in Gaza, the less President Biden looks like a man in command, and the harder it will be for him to beat Donald Trump in Novemberâs election. That would be excellent for Putin, since a Trump victory is likely to mean âUkraineâs enforced capitulation to Russian terms at the negotiating tableâ. There is still a chance Bidenâs top team will find a way to convince Hamas and Israel to agree a deal. But Israelâs Benjamin Netanyahu has his own problems: the minute the war ends there will be an election. Polls suggest he will lose and could easily end up in jail on long-delayed corruption charges, so he has every incentive to draw out the war as long as he can. For Biden, this is a nightmare that may never end. For Putin, Gaza is the gift that keeps on giving.
To hear Andrew Robert talking about warfare from 1945 to Ukraine click here.
Gone viral
The online artist ND Stevenson has turned his talents to recreating famous paintings using only emojis. âAs far as I can tell, I am the inventor of this art form,â he says, âsince I am a genius and everyone else has a life.â See more here.
Life
Brigitte Bardot on the beach. Getty
What happened to the glory days of nudity?
Iâm not sure why anyone would want to get married in the nude, says Jeremy Clarkson in The Sunday Times. âMaybe the cost of living crisis means youâre forced to choose between a dress and a honeymoon.â But for whatever reason, itâs now possible, thanks to an enlightened mayor in Sardinia whoâs designated a local beach where couples can tie the knot, tackle out. And why not? When I was growing up, ânudity was everywhereâ. In every BBC Play for Today there would be a bit of dialogue and then, all of a sudden, âsomeone with a Seventies welcome mat between their legsâ would breeze in and start making tea.
Back in the day, any time you popped into a petrol station for a pack of sherbet lemons âone whole wall would invariably be plastered with a seemingly endless selection of girlie magazinesâ. Now, nudity is frowned upon. If you go to Juan-les-Pins this summer, âyouâll see very few women in carefully designed topless swimsuitsâ. The days of Brigitte Bardot letting it all hang out are over. The remaining nudist beaches are mainly for people who are âmelanoma enthusiasts, German or madâ. At a nude beach in Mykonos I once met a young man wearing only motorcycle boots. He must have got up that morning and thought: âWhat do I need? Sun cream. Towel. And motorcycle boots.â Not the thought process of someone whoâs sane. Why do you think these beaches so remote and hard to access? âItâs not that we donât want to see all those bits. Itâs that we donât want to see the people the bits are attached to.â
Advertisement
Murray International Trust
To deliver a strong, rising and reliable income from equities, we believe itâs important to target exceptional companies. Thatâs why our investment process is built to interrogate every potential companyâs management, finances, and business model. Capital at risk. Click here to learn more.
Tomorrowâs world
A Chinese labourer sorts plastic bottles for recycling near Beijing. Fred Dufour/AFP/Getty
Recycling plastic is worse than useless
Itâs time to acknowledge an uncomfortable truth, says Eve Schaub in The Washington Post: plastic canât be recycled. âThis seems counterintuitive.â Weâve been told for decades that the answer to the plastic-waste crisis is more, better recycling. âIf only we sorted better!â If only we rinsed more thoroughly! But unlike paper, glass and metal, plastic âis not easily, efficiently turned into new productsâ. What passes for ârecyclingâ is âcostly, energy-intensive and toxicâ, and needs the addition of a âshocking amount of new virgin plasticâ: around 70%. Only about 5% of plastic actually gets recycled â or 30% at the most for certain varieties â compared to 68% for paper and cardboard.
Even if we could properly recycle plastic, weâd be foolish to do so. Itâs made from âfossil fuels and toxic chemicalsâ â when you grind up, melt and re-form it, those thousands of dodgy chemicals âcombine to make a Frankenstein materialâ. Chemicals that are not supposed to be there start showing up. You do not want your food wrapped in this stuff. Recycling plastic also adds to the crisis of microplastics, tiny particles that scientists are finding âeverywhere they lookâ, including in human sperm and human brains. âA study of just one plastics recycling facility discovered that it might be washing three million pounds of microplastics into its wastewater every year.â We should treat plastic âlike the toxic waste it isâ and send it where it can hurt people least: landfill. Then we need to get to work on the real solution: âmaking a whole lot less of itâ.
Zeitgeist
The Jacobite steam train crosses the Glenfinnan Viaduct. Tim Graham/Getty
Creative train drivers? Iâd settle for punctual ones
âHold your wine glass steady,â says Douglas Murray in The Spectator. The other day, the BBC splashed the news that train drivers in the UK are âoverwhelmingly middle-aged white menâ. What a surprise. Donât they know that most of the UK is white and half of it is male, with the male half tending to be more âtrain-orientedâ? You donât see many women at the end of Reading station ânoting down train numbers in a little bookâ. I had always expected the diversity obsession would be confined to âhigh-status professionsâ. Most road-layers are men, for example, but so far nobodyâs moaning that ânone of us are free until women are made to lay more tarmacâ. Yet it seems the age we live in is âeven madder than I thoughtâ.
Take Zoey Hudson, âhead of talent, diversity and inclusionâ at Southern Railway, who spouts the âusual verbiageâ that comes with her line of work. âItâs really important that we have diversity of thinking within the railway,â she explained to the BBC. âIt brings creativity.â Iâm not sure how much creativity I want in my train drivers. Loyal, punctual, good in a crisis â these are the qualities I look for when boarding the 7.48 to Totnes. But creativity? I suppose, for Hudson and her colleagues, trying to push more women into the railways is âsomething to doâ. But itâs silly to suggest that the reason only one in 10 train drivers are women is because middle-aged white men are blocking their path â as though the very existence of these men âis some sort of affront to minoritiesâ.
Weather
Quoted
âBlessed are the young, for they shall inherit the national debt.â
Herbert Hoover