• The Knowledge
  • Posts
  • Why the Palestine protests are rattling our universities

Why the Palestine protests are rattling our universities

🛩 Flying failures | 🔥 Burning of the Briggs | 🇫🇷🇬🇧 Tunnel politics

Comment

A pro-Palestine protest at King’s College Cambridge. Henry Nicholls/AFP/Getty

Why the Palestine protests are rattling our universities

Visiting UCL to watch a pro-Palestine demonstration, I was struck by how little interest most of the non-protesting students showed, says James Marriott in The Times. No surprises there. British universities have now seen more than a decade of protest – “a radical spell longer than even the golden age of campus activism in the 1960s”. When I arrived at university in 2011 the protests were against tuition fees. Then came the anti-capitalist Occupy movement, Rhodes Must Fall, MeToo, the anti-Brexit marches, trans rights, Extinction Rebellion, BLM and Just Stop Oil. There’s scarcely been a year since 2010 when an undergraduate with “radical aspirations and a spare afternoon” could not have found a march to attend.

That might sound like hell for university administrators, but they’ve managed to adjust themselves to the new “ambient mood of political radicalism with almost suspicious ease”. Vice-chancellors have mastered the jargon of protest, meeting student anger with “bland agreement”. When students declare a university’s museums “colonial relics unworthy of a progressive modern institution”, the museums simply write a few plaques concurring; they protest against themselves. But when the “radical” causes were relatively uncontroversial – everybody agrees racism is bad, for example – it was easy for universities to “burnish their moral reputations” by cribbing the language of “edgy politics”. The latest protests are different – hence the “panicked, incoherent response”. Suddenly universities are having to worry about Jewish student groups and “unhappy donors”. No wonder they’re struggling. In an age when protest has become “as inevitable a rite of passage as internships and graduation”, they have forgotten how to disagree with their students.

👨‍🎓✌️ There are two big differences between now and 1968, says Yascha Mounk in The Spectator. Today, almost nobody has actual skin in the game: very few protesters have any personal link to Palestine, “it is the scions of the white middle-class who seem especially prone to the most radical and nihilistic forms” of protest, and unlike in 1968, they’re not at risk of being drafted to fight a war they oppose. The other difference is that back in 1968, the establishment felt a duty to “uphold order and defend tradition”. Today, plenty of professors see themselves as the “natural inheritors of the student movement”. Many universities describe the events of 1968 with a mix of “pride and nostalgia”, and actively market themselves as “great places for political activism”.

Global update

This map of the most common surname in each country is surprisingly gripping, says Mental Floss. Kim is the most common last name not just in North and South Korea, but also in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. Smith dominates the anglosphere, coming out top in the UK, US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, with notably hold-outs in Ireland (Murphy) and South Africa (Nkosi). The most popular family name in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Ilunga, comes from Bantu and is specifically given to people who “forgive any abuse for the first time, tolerate it a second time, but never a third time”. Madagascar’s Rakotomalala means “beloved child” and Peru’s Quispe means a “glass-like precious stone”. Rather less sweet: Finland’s most common surname, Korhonen, means “old hard-of-hearing person”. Tap the map above to see a zoomed-in version, or click here.

Advertisement

Is AI capable of emotions and can artificial empathy make us feel better? While proponents argue that AI, unfazed by human fatigue and biases, can offer consistent emotional support, others question the ethics and potentially dangerous impact of bonding with machines. “Unlike humans, an AI doesn’t get stressed out or burned out. It can work 24 hours without getting tired”. This article from New Scientist provides a compelling look at the future of emotional AI and its potential to reshape our understanding of empathy itself. Read the full article on Readly, the magazine and newspaper app.

Quirk of history

Workers finally connect the French and English sides of the Channel Tunnel in 1990

Napoleon’s plans for the Channel Tunnel

The Channel Tunnel was “a project 192 years in the making”, says Roger Domeneghetti in The New European. The first detailed proposal to link Britain and France came as early as 1802, when horse-drawn stagecoaches were still the main mode of travel. French mining engineer Albert Mathieu-Favier “conceived two nine-mile tunnels meeting at an artificial island to be built in an area of shallow water”. Paved and with vaulted roofs, the tunnels “would have been lit by oil lamps and ventilated by huge iron chimneys reaching through the waves above”. In a temporary lull in hostilities between London and Paris, Napoleon discussed the proposal with the former British foreign secretary Charles James Fox.

When fighting resumed, the idea was scrapped – and in the coming decades, the viability of the tunnel mirrored the “fluctuating relationship” between the two countries. Some were worried the tunnel could aid a French invasion: British newspaper cartoons depicted “armies of frogs in battle uniform” emerging from it. From 1880 to 1882, a tunnel about a mile long had been dug at each end before a diplomatic spat brought efforts to a halt. This was despite the British company involved attempting to soothe concerns with “plans to install a portcullis over the entrance and mine the tunnel so it could be blown up in the event of attack”. Even when Britain and France became firm allies in the 20th century, it wasn’t until 1994 that the project finally came to fruition.

Enjoying The Knowledge? Click below to share

Tomorrow’s world

Getty

We’ve been “much too sanguine” about children and smartphones

A century from now, says Jemima Lewis in The Daily Telegraph, historians will look back at this period, when we allowed our children to have smartphones, with “queasy incredulity”. It’ll be like how we marvel at the fact that public executions were once considered a form of popular entertainment. “How was something so obviously wrong ever considered normal?” Last week, the National Crime Agency sent out an “unprecedented” alert to schools, warning that cases of so-called “sextortion” have increased eightfold. Sextortion is where criminals masquerading as teenagers flirt with children online, convince them to send nude photos, then threaten to make the pictures public if they don’t comply with their demands. Girls are typically forced to keep sending more (“and increasingly explicit”) photos; boys, who make up most cases, are generally asked for money.

You may think this sounds extreme, but I know three children – “sweet, sensible, much-loved children” – who have got in “serious danger” after being groomed by paedophiles via their smartphones. “Snapchat was flagged in nearly half the crimes involving child abuse imagery last year.” For my generation of parents, it’s probably too late. Not having grown up with all this technology, we have been “much too sanguine” about giving it to our kids: more than 95% of 12- to 15-year-olds have their own smartphones. But the next generation may be luckier. Almost 60% of parents in the UK want the devices banned for under-16s, an idea the government is now considering. Similar moves are afoot in France. The tide, finally, is turning. “You can almost hear the parents of the world weeping with relief.”

👾 For this week’s Heroes and Villains, click here.

Life

Briggs reclining on a deckchair he designed in Hyde Park. Cate Gillon/Getty

The late Raymond Briggs had a curious tradition with his friends, says The Times. Every milestone birthday, they would give the writer and illustrator “a lifesize effigy of himself, the more bad taste the better”. For his 50th he was given a papier-mâché Briggs in a coffin as part of a funeral-themed birthday party. For his 60th, the effigy was sitting on the loo – a nod to his 1970s children’s book, Father Christmas. For his 70th the creation was pushing a Zimmer frame; for his 80th, a shrunken figure in a wheelchair. And so, when the creator of The Snowman died in 2022, aged 88, it made perfect sense for his friends to honour his memory by gathering together all the effigies and burning them in a celebratory bonfire. They called it “the Grand Burning of the Briggs”.

On the way up

Daedalus and Icarus. Fine Art Images/Heritage Images/Getty

Man’s thousand-year quest to fly like a bird

Before the Wright brothers made the first powered flight in 1903, there was a “wildly dangerous and largely forgotten” history of aviation experiments, says Joe Fassler in LitHub. Records show attempts at birdlike flight “going back at least 1,000 years”. The ninth-century Andalusian polymath Abbas Ibn Firnas “supposedly experimented with a feather-covered winged glider that carried him some distance”, though he badly injured his back when landing. In the 11th century, a Benedictine monk named Eilmer, who believed the myth of Daedalus and Icarus was “literally true”, attached handmade wings to his arms and legs and launched himself from the tower of Malmesbury Abbey. “He soared over 600 feet before smashing back into the earth, shattering both legs on impact.”

The countless attempts to fly like a bird weren’t entirely in vain. In the late 19th century, Otto Lilienthal, a “brilliant and athletic German”, was able to glide “thousands of feet” with the contraptions he built “modelled on bird anatomy”. Yet he wasn’t content with gliding: powered flight was what he was after. Lilienthal eventually died when he crashed a glider in 1896 – and one of the people who read his obituary was a certain bicycle salesman in Dayton, Ohio named Wilbur Wright. Wright later recalled that the news sparked his own experiments with flight, experiments which “would change his life, and ultimately ours”.

Quoted

“Only the shallow know themselves.”
Oscar Wilde

That’s it. You’re done.