- The Knowledge
- Posts
- The masterpiece that took 12 years to write
The masterpiece that took 12 years to write
đ„ Wayward stiffies | đ Federerâs fashion | đ± Insoluble problems
Inside politics
Reeves: excitingly boring. Leon Neal/Getty
Labourâs plan is deadly dull. I love it.
It was encouraging, says Emma Duncan in The Times, to see that Rachel Reevesâs recent Mais lecture drew the ire of both Unite â âone of the most left-wing unionsâ â and the once-fashionable firebrand Owen Jones. She must be doing something right. The governmentâs favourite criticism of Labour, echoed by Unite this week, is that they âhavenât got a planâ. But thatâs silly. If whatâs meant by a âplanâ is some âsweeping, radical idea about how to revolutionise the structure of our economyâ, thatâs not what we need. We have a well-educated workforce, good economic governance and a top-notch services sector. But weâre struggling with threadbare âcapital stockâ â infrastructure, buildings, factories and so on â and piddling growth.
Whatâs needed is not some grand scheme, but small, sensible â yes, boring â tweaks. The most important part is the âsupply sideâ stuff, designed to free up businesses to grow without increasing public spending. Margaret Thatcher did it by crushing the unions and making it easier to hire and fire. Reevesâs equivalent is making modest reforms to the planning system to let firms âbuild more stuffâ â both houses, to relieve the housing crisis, and commercial space, to let businesses expand. She is also wise to continue Jeremy Huntâs sensible adjustments to the way pension funds work â to encourage more investment in British firms â and to devolve skills budgets to local authorities who know better than central government what shortages they have. Boring as they are, these suggestions should boost growth while costing taxpayers ânot a beanâ. Thatâs her plan. âTo me, its very dullness is rather exciting.â
Advertisement
Peter Sommer fell in love with travel in 1994, when he walked 2,000 miles from Troy across Turkey, retracing the route of Alexander the Great. An archaeologist by training, he began organising and leading historical tours in 1996, and set up Peter Sommer Travels in 2002. Twenty-two years later, Peter, his wife Elin and their team continue to run cultural and archaeological tours â including gulet cruises â for small groups, escorted by top experts. They have won the prestigious Tour Operator of the Year Award in six of the seven years it has been running, and received 750 independent reviews in the past decade â four rated âgoodâ, the other 746 âExcellentâ. To find out more, click here.
Life
Roger Federer used to dread the red carpet, he tells Zach Baron in GQ, not least because he felt he couldnât breathe while wearing a tie. Then, he had a very elite-athlete-style idea: âIâll train.â He wore more suits, but also took to wearing a tie with a jacket and jeans, or even âwith a cardiganâ, just to âmake sure I get used to the feelingâ.
Love etc
âDonât take it personally, love.â Roger Moore with Jane Seymour in Live and Let Die (1973)
Sex scenes in Hollywoodâs brave new world
Ewan McGregor has said that, while filming A Gentleman in Moscow, he used an intimacy coordinator for sex scenes with his own wife. Oh, brave new world, says the actor Simon Williams in The Oldie. Today, intimacy coordinators not only âchoreograph the lusting and thrustingâ, but also referee whatâs acceptable and what isnât. Rumpy-pumpy is no longer confined to the bedroom and is âseldom done horizontallyâ. With scant regard for comfort or safety, on-screen couples are asked to âthrash about on the stairs or against the Agaâ. Before kick-off, shivering actors are sprayed with glycerine because it âlooks like sweatâ. It also has a sweet taste, so itâs âlike snogging a boiled sweetâ.
Some things never change: young actors âapologise for their wayward stiffiesâ; older ones excuse a no-show. Roger Moore used to tell his Bond girls: âDonât take it personally, love. You can lead a horse to water and all thatâŠâ Other things have definitely improved. âPoor Susannah York had ice-packs held against her nipples between takes to keep them pert.â When Oliver Reed and Alan Bates were filming their al fresco naked wrestling scene in Women in Love, they used hot water bottles to keep their manhoods from shrivelling in the cold. People sometimes think of love scenes as a fringe perk of being an actor, âlike free oysters for a maĂźtre dââ, but not everyone enjoys them. One chilly morning in 1976, I had a sex scene with Glenda Jackson. We werenât really each otherâs cup of tea, and I was reminded of an old cartoon of a middle-aged couple pausing mid-coitus, with her saying: âCanât you think of anyone either?â
đ„đ¶ My first on-screen kiss was when I was 16, in 1962, with Jane Birkin, in a home movie directed by her brother. He cast us adrift on the boating lake in Battersea Park, and left us âkissing away the afternoonâ. Afterwards, I asked Andrew if he really needed so much footage. âOh no,â he replied, âI ran out of film after 30 seconds.â
Comment
Children in Denmark: can the government persuade people to have more? Getty
Give politicians a break â not all problems have solutions
Politicians have been promising to revive Britainâs deindustrialised regions for as long as Iâve been alive, says Janan Ganesh in the FT. The reality, never acknowledged in Westminster, is that this is a problem that âmight have no solutionâ. You can only do so much to counter foreign wage competition, automation and other global forces. âAsk the American Midwest.â Another âinsolubleâ issue is the baby bust. With birth rates too low to maintain current population levels, developed nations are desperate to persuade people to have more children. But how? Subsidised childcare hasnât made Nordic nations âultra-fertileâ â Sweden and Denmark have the same birth rate as the US. You could offer giant cash incentives instead, but at what cost?
The âultimateâ unsolvable problem is immigration. âIt is impossible, politically if not physically, for America or Europe to accept all, or most, or even a large percentage of the people who seek refuge there.â Yet it is also âunconscionableâ to leave them all in poverty, extreme heat or âbandit-ravaged failed statesâ. The issue canât be remedied by government policy because itâs the result of âtectonic stuffâ: rich nations being geographically close to poor ones; Africa bucking the birth rate decline. Admitting that some issues are intractable invites accusations of callousness. But pretending that âall questions have answersâ is far worse, because if â or when â the problem persists, politicians are decried as incompetent or indifferent. And thatâs âpoisonous to a nationâs civic healthâ. What we need, in short, is more âcanât-do spiritâ.
Books
Tom Hanks in Youâve Got Mail (1998)
The masterpiece that took 12 years to write
As someone who has been working on a book since 2008, says Lauren Alwan in The Millions, Iâm interested in how slow writers âtolerate the uncertainty that comes with a long projectâ. After all, some of our finest writers seem to âwork best at a clipâ. Saul Bellow produced âfour massive books in 11 yearsâ. Muriel Spark wrote The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie in less than four weeks; Anne Rice knocked out Interview with the Vampire in five. Kazuo Ishiguro drafted The Remains of the Day in a month, implementing a process he calls âThe Crashâ: nothing but writing from 9am to 10.30pm, Monday to Saturday, taking one hour off for lunch and two for dinner. âIâd not see, let alone answer, any mail,â he says, âand would not go near the phone.â
But among the slower cohort, whatâs remarkable is how many seem not to have worried at all, instead seeing a gestation period of a decade or more as a chance for âopenness and discoveryâ. JRR Tolkien, who spent 12 years writing The Lord of The Rings, once explained the hidden joy of it to WH Auden: âI met a lot of things on the way that astonished me.â Donna Tartt embraces the famous gaps between her books: âThings will come to you and youâre not going to know exactly how they fit in,â she says. âYou have to trust in the way they all fit together, that your subconscious knows what youâre doing.â
Weather
Quoted
âThe reasons grandparents and grandchildren get along so well is that they have a common enemy.â
American humourist Sam Levenson